KLAS1409 Learning and 21st Century Competencies: Collaboration, Creativity, and Technology (5 cr)
Study level:
Advanced studies
Grading scale:
0-5
Language:
English, Finnish
Responsible organisation:
Department of Educational Sciences
Curriculum periods:
2020-2021, 2021-2022, 2022-2023
Description
Contents:
Core skills needed in working life, creativity, sense making in learning, collaborative learning
Completion methods
Completion modes:
Participation in contact teaching and independent study, learning assignments and/or exam. Mode of completion to be specified in the Study Programme.
Assessment details
Assessment criteria: Active participation in teaching and completing and passing learning assignments/exam.
Learning outcomes
Learning outcomes:
- be able to apply theories of collaborative learning and creativity in changing teaching and learning situations
Upon completion of the course, students will
- have a fuller understanding of the nature of learning and the competencies needed in future learning environments- be able to apply theories of collaborative learning and creativity in changing teaching and learning situations
Study materials
Learning materials:
See also other study materials mentioned in the study programme.
- Hämäläinen, R. & Vähäsantanen, K. (2011). Theoretical and pedagogical perspectives on orchestrating creativity and collaborative learning. Educational Research Review, 6, 169–184.
- Arvaja, M. (2015). Experiences in sense making: Health science students’ I-positioning in an online philosophy of science course. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24, 137-175.
- Arvaja, M. & Sarja, A. (in press). Dialogic tensions in pre-service subject teachers’ identity negotiations. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research
- De Wever, B., Hämäläinen, R., Voet, M. & Gielen, M. (2015). A wiki task for first-year university students: The effect of scripting students' collaboration. The Internet and Higher Education. 25, 37–44.
- Hämäläinen, R., De Wever, B., Nissinen, K., & Cincinnato, S. (2019). What makes the difference - PIAAC as a resource for understanding the problem-solving skills of Europe's higher-education adults. Computers & Education. 129. 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.013
- Lämsä, J., Hämäläinen, R., Koskinen, P., Viiri, J., & Mannonen, J. (2020). The potential of temporal analysis: Combining log data and lag sequential analysis to investigate temporal differences between scaffolded and non-scaffolded group inquiry-based learning processes. Computers & Education, 143, 103674.
See also other study materials mentioned in the study programme.
Completion methods
Method 1
Evaluation criteria:
Assessment criteria: Active participation in teaching and completing and passing learning assignments/exam.
Select all marked parts
Method 2
Evaluation criteria:
Oppimistehtävien/tentin tekeminen hyväksytysti.
Select all marked parts
Parts of the completion methods
x
Teaching (5 cr)
Type:
Participation in teaching
Grading scale:
0-5
Language:
English, Finnish
Teaching
10/27–12/8/2020 Seminar
x
Independent study (5 cr)
Type:
Independent study
Grading scale:
0-5
Language:
English, Finnish